logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.05.29 2017고단1324
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around April 1, 2016, the Defendant stated that “B” is a person operating an engineering work body, and that “A, the representative of the victimized company, at the office of the Victim D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim D”) located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Yandong-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Co., Ltd.”), would make payments on the 15th day of each month, if materials are supplied to the scene at the present site for reinforcement works on the F Electric Source site.”

However, the Defendant had no intent or ability to pay the price in time even if he received the material from the victim, because the Defendant was unable to pay the cost of construction even if he was supplied with the material and received the cost of construction by being supplied with the material at another construction site. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the cost in time even if he received the material from the victim because he did not pay the cost of KRW 40 million.

Accordingly, the Defendant deceivings the victimized company as above, and its equipment from April 1, 2016 to the same year from the victimized company.

8. A person received construction materials, including reinforced soil, equivalent to 66,219,120 won in total by up to 27.

The Defendant of “B” is a person who operated an engineering work body in the name of “B,” and the Defendant is unable to pay the construction cost at the existing construction site because the financial situation of the construction company operated by the Defendant is not good. Therefore, even if the Defendant supplied reinforced block block for retaining wall construction from the victim G and received construction payment from the owner of the building, the Defendant intended to pay the construction cost as the outstanding amount at the existing construction site. As such, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to reduce the price for reinforced block.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the beginning of March 2017, supplied the victim with the reinforced block necessary for the field work where the retaining wall was stored in the building site located in the Sinju-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si, to the middle of the construction work.

arrow