logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.09.15 2014가단114930
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant Republic of Korea shall name the plaintiffs with respect to each of the 1/6 shares of the 2 real estate listed in the separate list.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. According to the forest survey report in the area of the Gyeonggi-do Tong-gun G (which was incorporated into the Seocheon-gun, around November 17, 1954) that was prepared by the Joseon General Department, the real estate listed in the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”) is registered as the owner, and it is not actually used as the owner of “State” and “IN” on the part of “IN” located in H, Gyeonggi-do. It is registered as the relative, and the real estate No. 2 in the attached Table No. 1 (hereinafter “instant land”) is registered as the owner.

B. As to the land of this case, J around December 191, 191, filed an application for registration of the owner restoration with the head of Si/Gun/Gu under Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Measures for Restoration, Preservation, etc. of Undeveloped Land within the Do Uniform Area (amended by Act No. 3627, Dec. 31, 1982; hereinafter the "former Special Measures Act"), on the ground that K, L, and M three persons who have a domicile in G area are the guarantor, and the said application was resolved by the Si/Gun/Gu Land Restoration Examination Committee under the name of J, the owner restoration registration was completed on February 27, 1993, the real estate registration register was completed on September 14, 193, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on May 3, 2005.

C. As to the real estate No. 2 of this case, the defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of preservation of ownership on February 26, 1996 after publication of non-real estate around September 15, 1993.

Although the Defendants alleged that the well-known and the plaintiffs' conciliation division are not the same person, ① the name of the well-known person and the one under the names of the plaintiffs' conciliation division are written by the authors, and thus the shape is different in accordance with the forest survey report, the removal of the register, and the old forest register, but it appears to be the same person as a substitute, ② all of the Chinese characters appear to be the characters created by the employer by the association, ③ the forest survey report, and the forest survey report.

arrow