The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although misunderstanding the facts and misapprehension of the legal principles acknowledged the fact that the defendant and the victim argued the victim's horses as stated in the facts charged, the victim E's chest was not the head, the victim's hair was considered to have been reduced, but it was not the degree of injury, but the other party's head was forced because D was pushed his own head, and it constitutes a legitimate defense or a legitimate act, the court below found the defendant guilty of all the facts charged and affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (one million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion that misunderstanding of facts and legal principles does not constitute violence and injury, the defendant can be found to have inflicted bodily injury on the victim E in the course of wrapping the victim E at the time of the instant case, and the victim E's hair, so long as the victim D's hair was satisfed so that it could be difficult to take care of approximately two weeks (14 days) and caused bodily injury to the victim D, satisfing, satisfing, satisfing, and tension, and it cannot be seen as a minor part of the injury suffered by D, but it does not constitute a crime under the Criminal Act.

2) In full view of all the circumstances, including the developments leading to the instant crime, means and methods, surrounding circumstances, and conditions before and after the commission of the crime, as revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the Defendant’s act of assault or bodily injury in the course of wrapping with the victims, and cannot be deemed as a justifiable act that does not go against the legitimate defense of another person or social norms regarding unfair infringement.

3) Therefore, the court below did not err by misunderstanding the facts or misapprehending the legal principles as asserted by the defendant or his defense counsel.

(b).