logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.07.04 2019고합39
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등간음)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for 3 years from the date of the conclusion of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are between the same NAN line, and the victim C (n, 17 years old) is the fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor.

At around 01:00 on July 30, 2018, the Defendants, including the victims, followed the alcohol as well as the alcohol in the Dialll E of Pyeongtaek-gun, and got the victim and three persons to sleep in the ward at around 05:00.

Defendant

A around the same day, around 05:25, at the ward of the victim in the above gate, he was able to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim's body and was off the victim's clothes. From this point, the victim frighted her own clothes by her hand, sealed the victim's clothes, sealed the victim's sexual organ into the victim's sexual organ, added the victim's sexual organ to the victim's sexual organ, and frighted the victim's sexual organ to the victim's sexual intercourse with the victim's body, and then moved the victim's body to the defendant B by putting the victim's body. In addition, the defendant A fright her sexual organ into the victim's body with the victim's body and added the victim's her sexual organ to the victim's own son's own son's own son's own son's own son's own son's own son's own son.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to have sexual intercourse with the victim who is a child or juvenile by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Recording notes;

1. Stenographic records;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the gene assessment document (No. 19) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 7 (5) and (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants with discretionary mitigation are advantageous to the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act.

arrow