The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. On July 10, 201, the summary of the facts charged, around 18:30 on July 10, 201, the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant and the victim made a speech that did not take into account the victim D(55 years of age)’s home intention, carried out a dubing with the victim, and carried out physical fighting with the victim, and had the victim go beyond the upper end of the said sperm, and had the victim go beyond the upper end of the said sperm, including two dubages that require approximately 20 weeks of treatment.

2. The facts acknowledged by this court based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court. ① The victim initially stated that “the victim was suffering from injury caused by the bones bed and satisfed in the bed, adjacent to the victim’s satisf, and lost consciousness.” The victim suffered injury by the Defendant’s satisfing the victim’s satch satfry and walking the bed and satisfing the victim’s satch satf,” or simply stated that “the Defendant was suffering from injury caused by the victim’s satch satf, following the victim’s satch satf,” and there is no consistency in the statement. ② E witnessing the scene at the time was unable to view the Defendant’s body and the victim’s body at all, and ③ The victim could not be excluded from the process of losing the center of the victim’s body at the time when the victim’s satisf was found to have been aware of the fact that he was aware of the victim’s sat.