All appeals filed against the Defendants and the Prosecutor A are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendants 1) 1) misunderstanding that Defendant A was guilty (1) Defendant A did not assist the victim’s suicide, and instead, Defendant A attempted to kill the victim’s suicide.

(2) On November 25, 2016, Defendant A introduced the victim R to the lower part of the chest, and Defendant A had no intention to commit an indecent act. However, on November 26, 2016, Defendant A had a less dancing in line with the victim R, but did not have any intention to commit an indecent act. On December 7, 2016, Defendant A had no intention to commit an indecent act.

(3) Nevertheless, among the facts charged against Defendant A, the lower court convicted the victim R of attempted suicide assistance and attempted suicide, and each forced indecent act. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

B) The lower court’s sentencing against Defendant A is too inappropriate.

2) The lower court’s sentencing against Defendant B is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentencing against Defendant A of the Prosecutor is too uncomfortable.

2. Determination

A. Defendant A also asserted that Defendant A had the same purport as the assertion of mistake of facts as that of the above facts, and the lower court rejected the above assertion in detail, stating in detail the judgment.

In light of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the judgment of the court below is justified, and the defendant A's above assertion is without merit.

B. Defendant A’s crime of this case committed in collusion with Defendant B to commit suicide by aiding and abetting the victim K, M, N, and nameless wounded, in collusion with Defendant B.

I attempted to commit suicide by aiding and abetting the victim R.

The crime is not good due to the indecent act committed by the victim R on three occasions, and the defendant A can die without pain if he commits suicide due to nitrogen gas.

(b).