logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2020.09.28 2019가단18012
월남참전연합군명예수당국제수준에준한청구
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff asserts to the following purport. A. The plaintiff asserts to the following purport.

The plaintiff is an organization consisting of Vietnam War veterans or their families, including soldiers suffering from defoliants.

B. Countries around the world, including Australia, the Philippines, and Thailand, have paid a considerable amount of honorary allowances to their Vietnam War veterans, but the Defendant has been paying compensation in accordance with standards that much less than those of them.

C. The Defendant is obligated to pay the Vietnam War veterans and their families at an international level, and must pay the full-time payment of KRW 1.76 billion per capita and KRW 2,145,00 per month of the regular payment per capita.

C. The defendant

The sum of the total wartime veterans' honorary allowances to be paid in lump sum to Vietnam War soldiers and their families has reached approximately KRW 609.

E. The Plaintiff claims payment of KRW 35 million as part of this amount.

2. However, even if the plaintiff's assertion itself is based on the plaintiff's assertion, since the claim for an international level of wartime veterans in Vietnam, who are members of the plaintiff, and their families asserted that they have against the defendant, belongs to an organization, the plaintiff's claim for payment of the amount of wartime veterans shall not be considered to belong to the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff

(1) The Plaintiff’s application for correction of a party’s indication on June 19, 2020, in which the Plaintiff changed the parties from the Plaintiff to “B” as the representative of the Plaintiff, is not accepted, since it is not recognized that the identity is not recognized between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff as an organization. 3. The Plaintiff’s application for correction of a party indication is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow