1. The Defendants shall deliver the building indicated in the attached Form to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

1. Indication of claim;

A. On April 28, 2006, the Plaintiff Union obtained authorization for establishment from the head of the Busan Dong-gu, the head of the Si/Gun/Gu on April 28, 2006, and decided on the management and disposal plan at the general meeting of the management and disposal around July 2015.

B. Accordingly, on July 2, 2015, the head of the Busan East-do government decided to authorize the management and disposal plan of the Plaintiff Union, and announced it on July 29, 2015.

C. The Defendants are co-owners of the attached building located within the rearrangement project zone of the Plaintiff Union.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff Union asserted that the Defendants had the duty to deliver the above building to the Plaintiff Union for the removal of the above building located within the rearrangement project implementation zone for the implementation of the Plaintiff Union’s project, and sought the delivery of the building against the Defendants.

(2) The Defendants, the co-owners of the above building within the rearrangement project zone of the Plaintiff Union, lost their right to use and profit from the building, and the Plaintiff Union acquired the right to use and profit from the building for the implementation of the rearrangement project. Thus, the Defendants’ obligation to deliver the above building to the Plaintiff may be harmed by the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents.

A. Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act against Defendant B, C, and D (a judgment by service by public notice)

B. Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act against Defendant E (i.e., a judgment deemed as a confession)