1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 2015, the director of the Central and Local Forest Administration B of the State Forest Administration (hereinafter “B State Forest Administration”) announced the public announcement of the sale of state forest products to the State Forest Administration B of the State Forest Administration (hereinafter “Cheongju-si”).

B. On August 5, 2015, the Plaintiff purchased the following forest products from the Defendant for KRW 90,010,50 from the above land (hereinafter “instant land”) on August 5, 2015, and paid the purchase price around that time.

- A.I. - The volume and volume of forest products used for the type and volume of wood (in cubic metres), the volume of wood (in cubic metres) sold (in cubic metres), the volume of wood (in cubic metres) sold (in cubic metres), the volume of 810.39 886.39 164.02 3568.97 846.33 6.33 84 6.82903.82 327.82905.09.04 General Sc 109.50 53.53.143 1,380.78 1,021.78 10,021.61,60.72

C. On October 18, 2015, the Plaintiff raised an objection to B State Forest Administration on the ground that the actual main ingredient is 630 parts, 302 parts, 2801 parts, and 101 parts, totaling 3,834 parts, of pine trees, were insufficient.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s alleged state forest management office should have accurately grasp and publicly announced the species and quantities of state forest products while proceeding with the sale of state forest products, but instead sold them on a rough basis without due care, thereby causing damage to the Plaintiff, who believed and purchased the species and quantities specified in the tender notice and the contract, to the effect that he/she purchased them in trusting the species and quantities of state forest products stated in the tender notice and the contract (=0.3825 (3,834 ±.834 ± 10,500 (10,500 won) of the sale price 】 90,010 (50 won of the purchase price) of state forest products).

After confirming the shortage of quantity, the Plaintiff filed an objection, and D affiliated with the State Forest Administration Office intended to refund the purchase price corresponding to the deficient portion, but did not implement the agreement.

The actions of the Director of National Forest Administration and D are contracts for the sale of forest products.