logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 영동지원 2016.04.14 2015고단248
공용물건손상미수등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 23, 2015, the Defendant attempted to damage public goods at around 04:10, the Defendant, in front of C in the Chungcheong-gun B, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, who called for a disturbance, took a bath to police officers belonging to the Young-dong District, who called for a disturbance, and called for the disturbance, and, at the same time, tried to damage the front and front glass of the patrol vehicle three times and two times, by reporting the D patrol vehicle parked at the scene, but failed to achieve that intent.

Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to damage goods used by public offices, but attempted to commit such an act.

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties by the police officer F belonging to the Young-dong Police Station E District, and caused the above actions to be obstructed by the police officer F, which led to the above F, walking to the left side of the F once, walkinging the knebbbbbs toward the F, and expulsion from the police officer G, which led to approximately three times the knebs of the above G, walking to the knee and walking to the knee, and the knebs of the police officer H’s knebs in his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning 112 reporting duties and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F, G, H, and I;

1. Articles 143 and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of attempted damage to goods for public use) of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Article 136 (1) of the relevant Criminal Act (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Where an act of assault and intimidation was committed against multiple public officials performing the same official duties as prescribed in Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act (a punishment prescribed by the obstruction of the performance of official duties against each other, and a punishment against the grave G), a number of interference with the performance of official duties is established according to the number of public officials performing official duties, and where the above act of assault and intimidation was committed in the same opportunity at the same place, and it is evaluated as one act in light of social norms, multiple interference with the performance of official duties are committed.

arrow