A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had a weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the recurrence of the existing islands, depression disorder, etc.

1. 업무방해 피고인은 2012. 9. 2. 15:00경 수원시 팔달구 C건물 5층 피해자 D가 운영하는 ‘E’ 옷가게 매장에서 아무런 이유도 없이 주위 손님에게 욕설을 하고 매장내 진열되어진 가방을 왜 이렇게 만들었냐며 직원들에게 던지고 진열된 원피스를 갈아입고 “남자친구가 영화를 보고 있는데 20분 뒤에 남자친구가 오면 결재해주겠다”고 하며 그냥 나가려고 하여 피해자가 “결재 없이는 옷을 입고 나갈 수 없다”고 하자 “이씨발 좆나 짜증나네 그딴게 어딨어 지금 귀찮으니 입고 나가서 결재를 해주겠다고 하는데 왜 지랄이야”라고 하며 옷걸이 옆에 있는 노랑색 백팩을 손님들에게 집어 던지는 등 소란을 피워 약 30분간 피해자의 의류판매 영업을 방해하였다.

2. The Defendant thefted the victim’s market value of KRW 51,800, which was displayed at the date, time, and place indicated in the above paragraph (1), by leaving the store without calculating and refluoring a color fluor equivalent to the market value of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A written confirmation of hospitalization and a written opinion;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing photograph photographs of suspects;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Article 10 (2) and (1), and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act that is legally mitigated;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;