Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the lower court rendered (two million won in penalty) is so excessive that it is unfair (the grounds for appeal filed by the Defendant on February 3, 2017, which was submitted by the Defendant, for an agreement with the victim).
As stated in the record, it is recognized that there is a favorable circumstance such as the fact that the defendant recognized and reflected his mistake, and that there is a need to consider the case of judgment and equality at the same time with the crime of injury in the judgment of the court below where the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive.
However, in full view of the following facts: (a) not only a number of criminal records of the Defendant, but also the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim until the depth of the Defendant; (b) the lower court appears to have rendered the judgment by fully taking into account the favorable circumstances for the Defendant; and (c) there seems to have been no reason to change the sentencing thereafter; and (d) other factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.