The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Judgment

Although the defendant led to each of the crimes in this case, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant in light of the legislative intent of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products aiming at protecting producers and consumers by guaranteeing the right to know and inducing fair trade by allowing the consumer to indicate the country of origin of agricultural and fishery products in an appropriate and reasonable manner, and inducing fair trade. The amount of sale by the defendant with the country of origin labeling for about three years reaches KRW 760 million, and the amount of sale by the defendant's false representation exceeds KRW 319 million, and even if the defendant's statement is made, the amount calculated by subtracting the purchase price of the defendant's imported goods from the sales price acquired from domestic production is about KRW 319 million, and even if the defendant's statement is based on the defendant's statement, it seems that the court below's punishment against the defendant is unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.