logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원영동지원 2015.09.18 2015가단853
배당이의
Text

1. It was prepared on June 9, 2015 by the above court with respect to the distribution procedure case No. 2015 another distribution procedure case in Young-dong District Court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant’s right to collateral security 1) C is a 1,653 square meters of land D on November 12, 2009 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

As to the maximum debt amount, KRW 20 million, and the debtor, Inc. (hereinafter “C&A”) shall develop the debtor (hereinafter “C&A”).

(2) On March 8, 2011, the Defendant completed the supplementary registration of partial transfer of the right to collateral security on the ground of partial transfer of the right to collateral security on December 23, 2010.

(hereinafter referred to as the "mortgage" of this case. B.

On September 21, 201, the Plaintiff issued a collection order for the attachment and collection of the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant’s claim based on an executory exemplification of a notarial deed No. 1221, 2009, issued a seizure and collection order for the claim against the Defendant’s claim against the instant claim based on the notarial deed prepared by a notary public of Daegu-do Joint Law Office.

On November 22, 2013, the above order of seizure and collection was served on the development of Green C&A.

(C) On November 22, 2013, the original collection order and the collection order and the above collection order were issued with eight and the third obligor, the owner of the instant real estate, and were issued with the third obligor, and thereafter, the decision of correction was made with the content of correcting the third obligor from E and eight to its development, and on November 22, 2013, the original collection order and the above collection order were served with the development of Green C&A, the third obligor.

F The F’s collection order of the F’s seizure and collection order of the instant mortgage claim against the Defendant F, based on the executory exemplification of the judgment in respect of the claim in question, such as the executory exemplification of the notarial deed No. 2037, 2006, Cheongju District Court, Young-dong District Court, 2008Gahap395, etc., and the executory exemplification of the judgment in respect of which the notary public prepared the Cheongju District Court’s 2005,684,931 won or less.

arrow