A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 9, 2014, around 07:35, the defendant reported 112 on the 255 side of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City (hereinafter "the defendant) to the effect that "in order to arrest a person with a fine for negligence," two police officers, such as a slope E, etc. belonging to the D District Unit, who received the above report, are on the back of the patrol, "I am on the following slope E," and "I am on the ground that I do not pay a fine," and even though the slope E said several times, I am without getting off the patrol car and am out of the patrol line to continue the patrol duty, I am on the ground that "I am am on the scambling, scambling E, etc., and walk the police officer's legitimate desire to maintain the public order and order", "I am on the scambling E and walk the police officer's duty."

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor in the area of mitigation [1. to 8 months] of the area of obstruction of performance of official duties (special mitigation] [1. to 3 months] [2] of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant had a record of committing a crime against a police officer, which leads to the crime of this case, although he had a record of committing a crime against a police officer, it is significant that the defendant has committed the crime in this case. However, the confession of the crime is divided, the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is not too serious, and the punishment is determined within the scope of the sentence for recommendation, taking into account the

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.