All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that, with respect to the punishment imposed by the court below (no. 10 months of imprisonment, No. 1, and No. 1) on the summary of the grounds for appeal, the defendant is too unfford, and the prosecutor is too unfford and unfair.

2. It is recognized that the defendant was committing a crime that is late later and against the wrongness of the defendant, and that the criminal punishment against the person who was dismissed is not imposed.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, occupation, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too heavy or unreasonable, and it is not recognized that it is unfair because it is too heavy or unfasible. In light of the above, the punishment imposed by the court below is appropriate, and it is not acknowledged that it is improper because it is too heavy or unfasible.

3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit. Thus, all of the appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.