beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,070,695 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from August 12, 2015 to October 28, 2016, and the following.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
(a) Project name and public announcement 1) Project name: Project implementer B road construction work 2: Public announcement made by the head of the original District Construction and Management Administration 3: Public announcement made on June 3, 2014 by the original District Construction and Management Administration C;
(b) Date of adjudication on expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal (1) on expropriation: January 22, 2015, the objects of compensation for expropriation and compensation for expropriation: The objects of compensation for expropriation and compensation for expropriation shall be as specified in attached Form A (B).
[4] The appraisal and assessment of 53,201,50 won (=52,201,500 won - 1,100,000 won) in total 53,201,50 won [4] appraisal and assessment of 53,201,50 won (=53,201,500 won - 1,000 won)] : One appraisal and assessment corporation (5) one appraisal and assessment corporation (5) : 53,243,00 won (52,143,00 won in this case) in appraisal and assessment: 53,160,000 won (52,60,000 won in this case).
(c) Date of adjudication by the Central Land Expropriation Committee (1) on an objection: The content of adjudication by the Central Land Expropriation Committee: 3) An appraisal: A new appraisal corporation in the future of a stock company, a central appraisal corporation (4) an appraisal value (4) a corporation in the future of a stock company (4) an appraisal value (50,579,000 (2) a total of 51,937,300 won (50,877,300 won (50,877,300 won) for a total of 51,679,000 won (50,579,000 won in this case).
D. This Court’s appraisal commission results, etc. (hereinafter “court appraisal”) with respect to appraiser E (the result of the appraisal reflecting the fact-finding”) is as indicated in the annexed sheet for calculating the compensation for landscaping trees. There is a difference between the sum total of the applicable amounts indicated in the calculation sheet and one won. However, in the process of applying the adjustment rate, the appraiser calculated the acquisition price after adjustment by dumping below the decimal point in the process of applying the adjustment rate, the above one won is not to be deducted separately. (ii) The fact-finding is modified according to the fact-finding.