1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Based on the facts, the relationship C (EE; hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) between the parties to the dispute is being treated by the Korea Forest University Hospital (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Hospital”) located in Chuncheon-ro 77 (Sacheon-dong), which is operated by the Defendant, and died on March 9, 201. The Plaintiffs are the parents of the deceased.

Around January 7, 2011, the prosecutor and the deceased, who had been performing during the period of internal and internal care of the Defendant Hospital, had been living in the hospital located in the vicinity of the residence, such as heat, bridges, and stokes, and the doctor affiliated with the hospital prescribed 5-day stoves for the deceased, in doubt of avian influenza.

From January 12, 2011, the Deceased continued to use two copies even after the use of lululuous plos, and from around January 12, 201, the Deceased appeared due to lack of force to proceed above on the bridge, and was in the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital at around 12:37, Jan. 14, 201 (hereinafter referred to as the “day date is omitted and the time is indicated”).

At the time of the emergency room, the body temperature of the Deceased was 36.8C, blood pressure was 180/100mHg, 102 times per minute (the normal water level: 60~100 times per minute) and respiratory was measured at 22 times per minute (the normal water level: 12-20 times per minute), and consciousness was measured at 12 times per minute (the normal water level: 12-20 times per minute) and the body was very poor, even though her answer was well-known and her body was not well walked.

The subject of the treatment performed by the dental branch of the Defendant hospital and the medical branch of the Defendant hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant hospital’s medical branch”) shall be indicated as “the medical branch of the Defendant hospital”; however, the medical branch shall be specified only when it is necessary to specify the scope of the treatment, such as a

Around 13:02, chest X-ray shooting and 13:54, respectively, were carried out against the Deceased, but no specific abnormal dogs have been observed. While the Deceased did not appeal, he/she conducted a neutism test with respect to the neutism of the deceased, however, he/she was found to have all of the neutism, neutism, speed, etc. of the neutism and nephism.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital shall be at 14:29.