1. Insurance money for the defendant based on the insurance contract indicated in the attached Form 2 as to the hospitalized treatment as stated in the attached Table 1.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 7, 2007, the Plaintiff concluded an insurance contract in attached Form 2 with B, the Defendant’s child, and the Defendant as the insured.

(hereinafter “the instant insurance”). The instant insurance is “the details of the instant insurance to guarantee the payment of KRW 100,000 per day of hospitalization in the case of being hospitalized for the direct purpose of treating a disease.”

B. From May 20, 201 to April 9, 2014, the Defendant received hospital treatment for a total of 783 days (at least 74% during the foregoing period) with a dysulgic merger certificate, etc., and the Defendant paid the Defendant totaling KRW 49,200,000 on the daily admission day.

C. The contents of hospitalization at this case during the above period are as follows.

(1) Medical institutions with diagnosis days of hospitalization period: (a) 19th of August 19, 2013; (b) 1.4th of October 14, 2013; (c) 2. Maternal urine 4.06th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 19th of the hospitalization period; (d) 4.4th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 19th of the 206th of the 20th of the 19th of the 206th of the 20th of the 206th of the 206th of the 19th of the 19th of the 2013th of the 2013 second of the 2013th of the 2013th of the 2014th of the 2013th of the 204th of the 3th of the 2014th of the ma.2.4.4.

2. Issues and judgments

A. The key issue of the instant case is that the Defendant’s hospitalization at the 19th or 24th hospitalization (hereinafter “instant hospitalization”) cannot be deemed as the direct purpose of treating the disease, and it has already been paid.