beta
Text
Defendant
B and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
C A corporation is a corporation established for the purpose of a construction business in the area D E of the wife population in Yong-si, and is a business owner who performs a construction business in the area of KRW 2,850,000,000 of the construction cost from H lending (representative I) of the F-Dong Construction of the F-Si Population in Tae-si
Defendant
B is a director of the above construction site and a person in general charge of safety and health, who is employed by him and a person who is responsible for the safety and health of his employees and a contractor and acts for C.
Defendant
A is an individual constructor who is a business owner and is responsible for the safety and health of his/her employees under a subcontract of KRW 46,800,000 among the construction works of the above F building G-dong construction works from C.
1. At around April 13, 2018, Defendant B and Defendant A’s joint criminal conduct (the occupational death, occupational injury, violation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act) had the victim J (the age of 66) who is an employee belonging to the said F building Gdong construction site perform the installation work of the stairs room.
Defendant
A, despite the fact that the safety appearance should be paid to workers engaged in the work that is at the risk of falling off or falling off the object, A did not properly check whether or not the victim is engaged in the work while wearing the safety appearance.
Defendant
B did not install a fall prevention facility, such as a fall prevention net, around the outside vision of the building, where workers are at the risk of fall, at the construction site of the above F building Gly Building Gly constructed, and the height of the vision is at least 2 meters, the work site is connected or fixed to at least two support units so that the work advertising materials do not fall behind or fall off, but did not properly manage and supervise whether workers wear safety caps.
Ultimately, the Defendants are above.