Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for eight months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was a working-level officer in charge of remodelling construction of the F building in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, who was in office in the permanent building of E council from April 1, 2010 to May 31, 2012.

Defendant

B, in fact, in the operation of the KG, some of the remodeling construction works of the F building was subcontracted by the KF building construction committee in December 201, and around February 2, 2012, it succeeded to the construction project after the termination of the construction contract between the FF building construction committee and the KG general construction committee.

1. When the construction cost falls short of the construction cost due to the relationship between Defendant B and Defendant B’s provision of adequate money and goods to Defendant A in relation to the remodeling construction of the said F building, Defendant B submitted an estimate by withdrawing the construction cost by borrowing the additional construction cost, and Defendant A intended to pay the construction cost softened by receiving the settlement in accordance with the estimate.

In March 2012, the victim in the first floor of the F building in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the defendant Eul submitted a written estimate to the effect that the additional central control device work is required in an amount equivalent to KRW 52,80,000 among the remodeling works of the said F building, and the defendant A obtained the approval of H and similar I attached to the said written estimate.

However, in fact, the above Central Control System Corporation did not require an amount equivalent to KRW 52,80,000, and the Defendants tried to acquire the construction cost by releasing it as above.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired in collusion, as seen above, deceiving the above Do-style Similars and insolvent Similars, and deceiving them from the victim to the agricultural bank account in the name of the Defendant B, and acquired money from which the amount cannot be known.

2. Defendant A received unfair solicitation from November 201 to February 2012 that the F building remodeling construction works from B from the E-type office located in the first floor of the F building in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government would be ordered by the KF building general construction and the KFG to receive orders.