The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case and the judgment of the court below

A. The summary of the facts charged in this case is as follows: the lower court rejected the Defendant’s and defense counsel’s assertion of innocence and found the Defendant guilty.

On January 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) on January 12, 2015, at the Defendant’s residence located in the Chungcheongnam-gun E; (b) on January 12, 201, the Victim F, who is an artist,

I think the fact that the victim's personal exhibition scheduled in G had not been cancelled for plagiarism, but the same year from January 26, 2015.

3. Until 12. There was an expected personal exhibition of the injured party;

H Liability Carter I: “I was scheduled in the coming two-month G

F. The F. Private will have been cancelled on January 7 due to the reasons for plagiarism.

“ e-mail sent” (hereinafter referred to as “e-mail of this case”)

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the opening of the art exhibition of the victim by fraudulent means.

B. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated, the lower court determined that the Defendant was aware of the fact that “the victim’s G exhibition was cancelled on the ground of plagiarism” was false at the time of sending the instant e-mail.

As seen, the Defendant determined that the Defendant was aware of the victim’s interference with the business of holding the exhibition by deceptive means.

The Defendant, as a professor of art department at a domestic and foreign university, was well aware of the characteristics of the exhibition business or the situation of the related industry, such as the experience in holding a private exhibition several times from the 1990s to the various gallons in Korea and abroad.

may be seen.

However, the Defendant, on January 12, 2015, cancelled the Victim’s G exhibitions on the instant e-mail to I on the ground of plagiarism, and displayed the Fgallon’s gallon’s G exhibitions on the ground of plagiarism.