The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Dsch Rexroth car.

On October 19, 2013, the Defendant, around 12:06, had the front house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan E-gu, run a side road of about 10-15 kilometers each hour.

Since there was a house with frequent passage of people, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the front left and left well and safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the victim G (Woo, 36 years old) due to the negligence that he neglected the front city, and did not discover the victim G (Woo), and the part of the defendant's car left-hand-hand-hand-hand side of the victim was shocked.

Ultimately, even if the Defendant suffered from an injury, such as “scarfing with a scarf,” which requires treatment for about four weeks by occupational negligence, the Defendant left without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

2. Summary of the defendant and defense counsel;

A. The Defendant (name H before the opening of the name) did not match G with a passenger car.

B. Even if shocked, the Defendant did not recognize it.

In addition, G said that he is fine for the defendant.

Therefore, the defendant does not leave the scene as the criminal intent of escape.

3. Determination

A. According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court by which the defendant was shocked by a passenger car, it is recognized that the defendant had shocked the right part of G with the left-hand chest part while driving a DNA motor vehicle at the time and place specified in the facts charged and driving it at the place, and shocked by G.

1 The developments leading up to the occurrence of this case ① The front road of the F, which is a coffee store operated by G, shall proceed to the right side from the left side of the Fgate on the basis of the direction to look at the outside.