The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that of the lower court’s punishment of KRW 500,00,000 is too unreasonable.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds of appeal by the defendant, if the defendant continues to conduct ex officio a number of acts falling under the name of the same crime for a single and continuous period under the single and continuous criminal intent, and if the damage legal interests are the same, each act shall be punished by a single comprehensive crime. However, if the unity and continuity of the criminal intent are not recognized or the method of committing a crime is not identical, each act constitutes substantive concurrent crimes.

(2) On November 11, 2010, the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the records of this case: (a) on April 201, 1, 201, the Defendant sold precious metal owned by her mother at her home (18 km 0.53 1, 14 1.9 k k 1, 14 k 1, 14 k 1, 14 k 14 k 1, 14 k 14 k 1 and 18 k 1.3 k 14 k k 1 and 18 k 18 k 17 k k 17 k m 1) and then sold it to 18 k k 1 and 18 m 18 m 10 k k m m 2, 201 m m 1 to 4 m 18 m m m 1.