1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The litigation costs shall be borne by the attorney of the plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is as indicated in [Attachment 2] and “the preparatory documents of September 22, 2017.” 2. The Plaintiff’s attorney’s right to attorney was examined ex officio prior to the judgment on the merits of determination as to the existence of such right. According to records, the Plaintiff enacted the management rules around March 3, 2005 with a non-corporate body composed of the four underground floors located in Gangdong-gu Seoul and the 14th floor owner of the commercial building, which was newly constructed on July 31, 2004, and the non-corporate body composed of the 14th floor owner of the commercial building, and the Plaintiff was appointed as the manager of the 1st general meeting around March 2007 (hereinafter “manager”), and the Plaintiff was appointed as the manager of the 20th general meeting from around April 1, 2007 to around 201, and the Plaintiff was appointed as the manager of the 3th general meeting of the 3th general building without the appointment of the Plaintiff from around 215th general meeting.

In the above case, “The Court” has received a decision, and this Court has appointed attorney G G as the administrator’s representative on January 29, 2016, and in the lawsuit of confirming the existence of management or abandonment against the Plaintiff, this Court filed against the Plaintiff as the case on the merits of the foregoing case, both the enactment and amendment of the above Code.