The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court, based on the determination that there is no special circumstance that the Defendant should not be restricted from employment, issued an employment restriction to child or juvenile-related institutions and welfare facilities for the disabled for seven years, and did not reduce the registration period of personal information by determining that the registration period of personal information under the Act on Special Cases

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the reduction of the period of employment restriction and personal information registration.

According to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence is imposed against the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.