logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.04 2015나35880
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. As to this case, the reasons for this court's explanation cannot be viewed as having set forth the conditions of invalidation of the judicial compromise in the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's second instance judgment's second instance court's second instance judgment's "if a judicial compromise in the first instance court's first instance court's second instance judgment becomes null and void due to the fulfillment of the conditions of invalidation or cancelled due to quasi-adjudication, it shall return to the state in which there was no compromise (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 94Da35343, Nov. 15, 1996). However, in this case, it cannot be viewed as having set forth the terms of validity of the above judicial compromise in the second instance court's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's conclusion that it is difficult to view that the plaintiff's second instance court's order to cancel the contract or to cancel the contract's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's second instance judgment's conclusion that the plaintiff's order did not have any reasons for cancellation or cancellation.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow