logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.04.02 2018가단656
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s Jeju District Court’s Jeju District Court 2015Kadan71 (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”).

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. The Defendant: (a) filed an application for a seizure and collection order (the Jeju District Court 2017TTTT1729) with respect to the deposit claims, etc. against financial institutions, including Nonghyup Bank, by using the executory exemplification of the decision on the amount of litigation costs determined by Jeju District Court 2015Kadan71; and (b) issued a collection order on April 12, 2017.

B. On April 26, 2017, the Plaintiffs deposited reimbursement of KRW 761,416, each of the above seized claims, and thus, the Defendant’s claims against the Plaintiffs were extinguished.

C. Therefore, compulsory re-election based on the original copy of the decision with executory power over the instant litigation cost determination case should be dismissed.

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Articles 208 (3) 1 and 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow