logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.03.13 2018고단1384
사기
Text

Defendant

A and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On December 7, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months in the former District Court’s branch of the Military Branch of the Jeonju District Court for embezzlement on December 7, 2016, and the above judgment was finalized on December 15, 2016. On February 7, 2018, Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for six months in imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, and confirmed on February 15, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

A and Defendant B are married, and Defendant C is the same as Defendant A middle school.

Defendant

From around 2005, A and Defendant B operated the “Eart” in Gunsan City D, and around April 2014, it was necessary to leave the building from the building to November 2014 and to find a new building to operate the marina.

During that process, Defendant C, who had been in close friendship, planned to purchase one of the second floor buildings to be newly constructed in the Sinsan City F, which was proposed to “I wish to purchase the first floor, and there was an idea to do so in that place.” On or around March 4, 2014, Defendant C entered into a verbal contract to lease the lease deposit amount of KRW 150,000,000,000 and KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, as the contract deposit, to Defendant C around June 2014.

However, at the time, Defendant A was not able to pay the remainder of KRW 130 million out of the lease deposit to Defendant C, and the building of this case to be leased was less than the existing E E E E E E E E Ete building and the cost of purchasing goods was insufficient.

Therefore, the Defendants prepared a false lease contract as if they entered into a lease contract, even though they did not have entered into a lease contract only on a monthly basis, and conspired to settle the shortage of the lease deposit by receiving the claim for the refund of the lease deposit from the financial institution as collateral.

Defendant

A shall visit L to the early February 2015 and make a loan for security deposit.

arrow