The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.

The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiffs.

1. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. On May 23, 2005, Plaintiff A, the deceased Party B, and the deceased Party A entered into a contract to the effect that the deceased Party A will receive KRW 300 million from the deceased Party A to the Plaintiff for the purpose of the division of property, donation, or inheritance of the deceased Party A, and KRW 200 million from which it will be paid until 2010, and KRW 200,000,000,000 per month for the deceased Party A’s meals, soons, cleaning, etc. as the deceased Party B, and receive KRW 20,00 per month for remuneration. The balance shall be paid by priority of KRW 20,00 per month and shall be settled at the time of division of property, donation, or inheritance of the deceased Party A (hereinafter “instant contract”).

Accordingly, as a result, the network B performed the Dominal duties between May 23, 2005 and July 20, 2009 and November 23, 201 and April 30, 201, and performed the 20-day nursing service at the request of the network AA. In addition, the amount to be paid by the network B from the network A is 6,934,00 won in total.

B. The deceased AA died on May 8, 201, and on the other hand, the deceased on October 14, 2014.

Therefore, as a family member of the deceased AA’s sibling or sibling, the Defendants, who are the deceased AA’s heir or substitute heir, are obligated to pay the Plaintiff C, D, E, and F, the heir of the Plaintiff and the deceased B according to their shares of inheritance.

2. The evidence supporting the conclusion of the instant contract, as alleged by the Plaintiffs, is the same copy of the evidence No. 19 (a letter of agreement, a letter of confirmation of payment, and a note of face value KRW 200,000, KRW 100,000, KRW 200, and KRW 100,000) No. 1, 2, 3, and 10

This paper first examines the authenticity of the petition.

First of all, there is no evidence to prove that the above payment confirmation note and the promissory note amounting to KRW 100 million are made by the seal of the network AA's name.

On the other hand, the above agreement and the promissory note amounting to KRW 200 million on the net AA’s name, and real estate held on October 2002 such as “real estate sales contract and each letter” and “real estate held on June 16, 199.”