Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

The defendants in the room of the factory are the siblings of punishment.

1. No person who is a defendant B shall divulge any fact openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame another person, thereby impairing the reputation of another person;

Nevertheless, at around 23:35 on August 26, 2014, the Defendant, at his father’s house of Nam-gu 105 Dong 1604, access to F to the following Kapet (htp://cafe.d.umt/) G, and access to the latest 103 Dong 1303 Boba" on the 1. Complaint;

2. Defendant H, address Nam-gu I apartment No. 103 1303, mobile phone J.

3. In the title of “the representative who wishes to go to the head of the Gu,” the purport of the complaint, the Defendant complained against the civil petition, and the civil petition was transferred to the viewing auditor room, thus spreading false facts to the public officials concerned. In addition, the Defendant damaged the honor of the complainant, who is a public official, and caused considerable impact on the workplace life by putting a telephone directly to the market room, the auditor room, and the general affairs department, and making him mistake from the workplace rent.

4. Criminal facts have damaged the reputation of the complainant, who is the president of the representative meeting of the I apartment occupants, and has given insult.

On July 27, 2014, when the election becomes final and conclusive at the election of the representative apartment, the complainant of the defendant's suit stated that K will return well the apartment tag, and that he would restore the damaged part of the public facilities occupied by the defendant as his representative to the original state.

Accordingly, K returned to Korea and spread the desire for the complainants.

5. The State shall be subject to punishment for the crime of spreading false facts, defamation and insult in the reason of complaint.

6. Other matters, on July 27, 2014, there is no complainants who have claimed for the bath that the Defendant alleged.

On August 26, 2014, A, a complainant, has a photographic file of the complaint prepared by A, "the return of the Chief of the Gwangju Southern Police Station" and A.