Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 7,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a company that carries on passenger transport services on 29 routes, including a metropolitan rapid transit bus and city, urban, and village bus, which operate the E and Seoul F section in Osan-si. The Defendant is a company that operates passenger transport services on 29 routes.

Where any motor vehicle user who violates the Motor Vehicle Management Act intends to maintain a motor vehicle, he/she shall maintain the motor vehicle within the scope prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and where he/she has at least one industrial engineer or technician with at least an industrial engineer for motor vehicle maintenance, the scope of maintenance shall not include gold or adjacent work.

Although the Defendant is the only qualified person among D officers and employees, and the user of the bus belonging to the Defendant should be fully aware of the relevant regulations and should not engage in illegal maintenance, the Defendant issued a direction to the Chief H of the Maintenance Division H to move the melting machine in the G taken over at the above location around July 2016 at the above location, and the maintenance division H, who is not entitled to the automobile maintenance at the above location on July 2016, instructed the maintenance division H to allow the repair of the vehicle four times, including the telecom show and the air pumps sponsed with I and J's engine room, and neglected to do so, thereby exceeding the scope of the automobile of the automobile user.

(b) Where a person who has obtained a license for passenger transport business violating the Passenger Transport Service Act intends to alter the business plan, such as increase of automobiles and reduction of automobiles, he/she shall obtain authorization therefor;

Nevertheless, from July 1, 2017 to September 19 of the same month, the defendant reduced the number of vehicles per day for the metropolitan bus from July 1, 2017 to 200, 12 reduction of the number of vehicles per day, 4 vehicles per day for L urban bus, 28 increased number of vehicles and 3 vehicles per day for M urban bus.