logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.13 2017고단174
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 8, 2017, at around 07:05, the Defendant reported to the effect that “D operating a taxi in front of the 14th elementary school, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, 51, a 14th elementary school, was under the influence of alcohol, and D was under the influence of alcohol,” and that “D was going to go to the taxi without getting a guest from the taxi,” and that “D was dispatched to the said place by the police officer of the police unit belonging to the Nam-gu police station of the Nam-gu, Seoul metropolitan District, the Defendant was called to the said place.”

The police officers, who called for this reason, recommended the Defendant to pay the taxi fee and return home, and the Defendant, who called the police officers called to the country under influence of alcohol, “I amblings, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling.”

C. Death shall be discarded.

“In doing a bath to the effect that “, by hand, assaulted F in a way of breathing the f’s breath and breathing the f’s bat, and bating the f’s f’s f’s bat.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public peace and order and the handling of 112 reported affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to F, G, and D;

1. Investigation reports, such as interference with official duties;

1. Investigation report (related to a global report, etc., and confirmation of the current status and the degree of violence);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of photographing the face of a victim;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the relevant criminal facts and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (opportune of imprisonment) committed the same kind of crime without weighting even though the defendant had been committed several times of violence.

Among them, there is also a fact that the appellate court rendered a judgment of suspension of execution on the grounds that it was against the dignity of detention for two months after the sentence was sentenced in the first instance court.

The Defendant has filed a multiple 112 report to ordinary people by causing problems, such as breathing the happiness while under the influence of alcohol.

In light of this, the sentence of sentence is inevitable for the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant committed crimes.

arrow