logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.06 2014고정4182
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 18, 2014, at around 21:13, the Defendant was driving a car parked on the alleyway between the apartment of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, with a view to driving a car that was parked on the alleyway between the apartment and the new apartment of the Anmian.

The vehicle driven by the Defendant was driven before and after the vehicle due to narrow distance between the front and the rear, and the person engaged in the driving of the vehicle was obliged to take care of preventing accidents by safely driving the front and rear parking vehicle and the left and right side vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so.

The phrase "G" in the indictment written by the victim C (I, 31 years old) who was parked in the later bank seems to be the clerical error of "D".

Benz's front part of the passenger car conflict with the defendant's second part.

Ultimately, the Defendant alleged that the vehicle number plate was destroyed due to the shock of this case, and the victim got gold to the middle part of the left part, and that the number plate was defective at the width of 1.5 cm. However, in light of the location of the damaged vehicle and the damaged vehicle, the route of the damaged vehicle, the speed of operation at the time, the shock level, and the degree of shock, etc., the damage caused by the shock of this case may occur, but at the same time, it is difficult to view that the damaged part of the vehicle number plate and the set caused the defects at the bottom of the number plate as a whole, and in view of the fact that there is no data to calculate the damaged part of the above damaged part of the damaged part of the charges, there is no evidence to acknowledge that “the part requiring repair cost to be equivalent to 1850,000 won” is not to be determined separately, but it is not to be determined separately.

arrow