The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. There is no fact that the Defendant made a mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles that “I satisfy has been sofyed by the victim” at the time and place indicated in the facts charged.

(2) Even if such remarks were made, the horses do not have the possibility of spreading in relation to the relationship of relatives or employment with the victim.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (fine 1.5 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles is based on the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below and the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court. i.e., the F made a live food of F at the seat of the community hall in the Mandong-gun, Mandong-gun on August 24, 2010, the Defendant made a statement that “I’s l’s l’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’, which had no influence on the Defendant’s 2’s h’s h’s h’s h’s h’.