logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.06.26 2014가단72633
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part of the plaintiffs' claim for consolation money against the defendant's social welfare foundation is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs were the children of the deceased I (hereinafter “the deceased”). The Defendant was a local government that established the Medical Care Center Specializing in the Aged and the Aged and the Aged and the Aged were established at 103, the Geong-gun, the Geong-gun, the Geong-gun, the 1005, and the Defendant’s social welfare foundation (hereinafter “Defendant Peung”) was a corporation that operated the instant Medical Care Center by being entrusted to the operation of the Medical Care Center by Defendant Peung-gun on October 1, 2013.

B. Around March 1, 2011, the Deceased was determined as a long-term care grade 3 on the grounds of dementia, etc. and hospitalized in the instant medical care center on March 3, 201. On October 31, 2013, the Deceased participated in a program for the implementation of a day-to-day care in the building of the instant medical care center, and went outside the entrance via the entrance, around 14:19 on the same day.

Around 15:50 on the same day, the employees of Defendant Dhee knew of the deceased’s death, and found the deceased’s family on the same day, and at around 17:00 on the same day contact with the deceased’s family. Around 17:20 on the same day, Defendant D’s employees, the deceased’s family members, police officers, etc. reported the disappearance to the police, and performed the search work for the deceased. On November 16:30, 2013, the deceased was found to have been deceased on the 295 YY-gun’s family members on the 17:20 on the same day after having reported the disappearance to the police. On November 16:30, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”), which led to the death of the deceased following his disappearance, C.

During the performance of the duties of caregivers, Defendant Pawn Co., Ltd., the maximum amount of compensation was covered by the Welfare Facilities Liability Insurance of Mez Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., which is the maximum amount of compensation for damages caused by the claim for damages during the insurance period, in relation to the damages caused by personal injury to others.

Plaintiff

B and D represent the Plaintiffs, who are the bereaved family members of the deceased, on November 6, 2013, “Defendant Phee” in relation to the instant accident, the civil damages amounted to Mez fire.

arrow