beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant C is KRW 10,000,000 and 5% per annum from January 11, 2013 to December 17, 2013.
Reasons
Based on the facts, the Plaintiff is a corporation established on August 11, 1997 for the purpose of developing, manufacturing, and selling financial automation machinery and is a corporation that manufactures and sells “definite type type recognition equipment” and has been de-listing at the KOSDAQ market on July 24, 2013.
Defendant B is a major shareholder of the Plaintiff and a person who was working as the representative director of the Plaintiff until January 11, 2013. Defendant C and D are immediately after Defendant B resigns, and Defendant E is a person who became the representative director of the Plaintiff, and Defendant E was a partner of Defendant D as the vice president of the Plaintiff.
The plaintiff and the plaintiff in the lawsuit of Chuasson Co., Ltd. had a good business performance each year, and the plaintiff achieved a stable profit of approximately KRW 27.8 billion in sales in 2012, KRW 6.9 billion in operating income, KRW 6.4 billion in net income, and approximately KRW 2.5 billion in net income at the time.
The Plaintiff sold fake waste coefficient through the “AMRO Cpool Corporation” (hereinafter “AMRO”) of the U.S. agent. The Plaintiff was sentenced to the judgment that “the Plaintiff and the Maloson shall be subject to a patent infringement lawsuit from Cromins-Aison Ltd. (hereinafter “Croman Lloson”) and shall be subject to the patent infringement lawsuit from Cromins-Aison Ltd. (hereinafter “Croman Lloson”) on October 30, 2009, and paid the Plaintiff and the Daloson District Court of Cropon Drin support (U.S. Divis), “The Plaintiff and the Duloson shall be subject to U.S. 11,898,279, interest, etc.” as damages compensation.
Accordingly, the plaintiff and Maro appealed to the appellate court of the United States of America, but on May 29, 2012, the decision was rendered to maintain the judgment of the first instance court on the payment of damages, and the plaintiff renounced the appeal.
After that, on September 14, 2012, Cerman Lison requested a judgment of execution on the part that ordered payment of USD 13,013,255 of the above judgment to the Seoul Central District Court, and the above case is the case.