logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2020.09.09 2020고정605
사기방조
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

After posting a letter on the Internet B website, the name-dissceptist intended to defraud the sales proceeds by means of not sending the goods to the victim only after receiving only the price. On November 201, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from the Mescopistist in the name of the Mescopist in the name of the Defendant that “if he/she carries out the business of remitting the money deposited into the account to G-ONEY (Overseas Transfer Service Mescop)”; (b) notified the Mescopt Bank Account (C) in the name of the Defendant; and (c) while carrying out the said business, he/she received the said business from the Mescopist E belonging to the Mescopist in the Gyeonggian Police Station of the Gyeonggi-gu Group, stating that “G-MONEY transfer was related to the crime of fraud, and thus, he/she was willing to deliver the money wired to the Defendant’s account to the account designated by the recipient of the fraudulent amount.”

On December 10, 2019, the name omittedist stated that “Aphone 11 will be sold if you send the price” to the victim F (hereinafter 25 years of age) using B Messenger at a non-bank place.” On December 11, 2019, the victim sent KRW 150,000 under the name of the sales price to the account of the above Suhyup Bank under the Defendant’s name.

At around December 15:18, 2019, the Defendant received an instruction from a person who was not entitled to the name, and sent the above KRW 150,000 to an account designated by the person who was not entitled to the name, using G-MNEY display at a non-place. From that time, the Defendant remitted the amount of fraudulent damage to the person who was not entitled to the name, at least eight times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from December 21, 2019.

As a result, the Defendant provided his account so that he can use it for the commission of goods fraud, and aided and aided the crime of fraud of a person who was unable to receive his name by remitting the amount of fraudulent damage transferred to his account to his name.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow