A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car B i30.

On July 2, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.238% among blood transfusions on July 2, 2018, and led to the driving of the said car on the one-lane road in front of the D cafeteria in the ethic City C along the direction from E to the upper distance.

A driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence while neglecting this, stated in the indictment that “F is driven by the victim F while parked in the front section of the Defendant’s vehicle.” However, when using CCTV images for crime prevention, it is confirmed that the head of the damaged vehicle and the interior at the time of the instant accident were in a exhaustion, etc., at the time of the instant accident, and when examining the black image of the damaged vehicle, the Defendant did not indicate the speed of the damaged vehicle in the front section of the damaged vehicle (Head Uisla Disy) at the time of the instant accident, and after the damaged vehicle stops in the front section of the vehicle, the Defendant continued to indicate the speed of “0” even when the damaged vehicle stops in the front section of the vehicle. However, it appears that the front section would not have operated during the day without the need to turn the headlight, and the victim would not have been found to have been dead at the time of the instant accident. As such, the victim could not be deemed to have been on board the vehicle at the time of the instant accident.

F followed by the Ggland Kaman's passenger car, the left-hand side of the defendant was shocked by the front-hand part of the passenger car of the defendant.

Defendant 4,444,813 won, such as the replacement of the said vehicle by negligence in the course of business as above, are repairing costs.