logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.06.29 2017고단72
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one year for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) in the Redness Support of the Daejeon District Court (a collective act of violence) and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon Prison on April 13, 2015.

At around 03:20 on December 25, 2016, the Defendant, upon receipt of a report that the assault case occurred within C main points located in the petition district located in B at the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-dong Police Station D police officers belonging to D District Unit of the Cheongju-gu Police Station, sent a bath to the Defendant’s fighting, and, at the same time, read, “this dog’s spath and spath down,” and spats the e-mail and spaths of the above E.

Therefore, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning reporting processing duties by police officers who are public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Photographs of the victim;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The elements of sentencing unfavorable to the reason for sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes: To prevent a police officer who was dispatched upon receipt of a report from having obstructed his/her legitimate performance of his/her duties, which is held during the period of repeated crimes. Do favorable sentencing factors: Recognizing the mistake and reflectivity. Do and other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are considered to be active crimes under the influence of alcohol. In full view of the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the

arrow