1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,120,220 as well as 5% per annum from March 8, 2019 to January 31, 2020 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff leased the instant No. D to E, as the owner of the Busan Seo-gu C Apartment D (hereinafter referred to as “instant No. D”)

The Defendant is the owner of Fho Lake, the immediate upper floor of the instant subparagraph D (hereinafter referred to as “instant F”) and resides in the instant subparagraph F.

B. 1) Around August 2015, the Defendant extended the balcony of the instant subparagraph F, around 2012. (2) around August 2015, the number of water leakages in the 1st page of the annexed drawing among the instant subparagraph D (hereinafter referred to as “the instant number No. 1”) and the wall were generated in the ceiling and the wall, and the construction cost incurred for reconstruction after the removal of the wall exhausting construction and the wall bed, in order to recover the damage caused by the 1Nu20,000, is KRW 654,970 (value added tax separate).

3) On January 2019, the number of pages No. 2, 200, among the instant No. D, has arisen (hereinafter referred to as “the number of pages No. 2” in the following).

) Fung in the ceiling and walls and damaged the floor level, and the construction cost required for Doing Construction and Maintenance of the floor board is KRW 817,960 (excluding value-added tax). [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries and images in subparagraphs 1-2, 1-2, 1-2, 1-2, 2-2 through 5, 6-1, 6-2, and 6-2, and the results of appraiser G’s appraisal, the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Determination:

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that this case occurred in the first page of this case due to F, and around November 2015, the Plaintiff replaced the ceiling and wall distribution damaged by the first column of this case.

Around July 2018, the instant number of copies No. 2 occurred in the second bank of the instant case due to the instant F, and around March 2019, the Defendant performed the construction of floor water supply pipe repair works in the part falling under the upper part of the instant subparagraph No. 2 among the instant subparagraph F, and around that time, the Plaintiff performed the construction of double-section repair works in the instant bank No. 200, and thereafter, the number of copies was incurred in the instant bank No. 200.

Each of the instant cases.