logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.09.22 2015가단237454
배당이의
Text

1. Of the distribution schedule prepared by the Busan District Court on October 26, 2015 in the Busan District Court J distribution procedure:

A. Defendant B-.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. Provisional attachment (1) Plaintiff (Appointed Party), Appointed (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) and the Defendants filed an application for provisional attachment against Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Tsung Heavy Industries”), Mascopex, and Mexico Co., Ltd. on November 20, 2014 with Busan District Court 201 as Busan District Court Decision 2014Kahap1481 to accept the claim for overdue wages against L, U.S.C. engineering, and U.S. C. C. as the right to preserve the claim for overdue wages from the Defendant’s wage debtors.

(2) At the time of the application for provisional seizure, the plaintiffs and the defendants filed an application for provisional seizure by dividing the claim amount by the third debtor. Accordingly, the decision of provisional seizure was made by dividing the claim amount by the third debtor and provisional seizure. The total claim amount by the plaintiffs and the defendants and the claim amount by provisional seizure against Samsung Heavy Industries are as stated in each corresponding column of the attached seizure and distribution details.

B. (1) Following the confirmation of enforcement title (1) the Plaintiffs and the Defendants filed a lawsuit claiming the payment of overdue wages against the aforementioned L, etc. with the Busan District Court 2014Gahap51223, and the Busan District Court jointly and severally decided on December 31, 2014 that the aforementioned L, etc. shall be jointly and severally authorized the Plaintiffs and the Defendants to pay the overdue wages until January 23, 2015. The said decision of recommending reconciliation was final and conclusive as to the Defendants on the grounds that the Defendants did not raise any objection, and the Plaintiffs did not object thereto, and the judgment became final and conclusive at that time.

(2) The principal of the above judgment against the plaintiffs and the above ruling of recommending reconciliation against the defendants is as stated in the column of the principal in the execution title of each of the attached Table of Attachment and Distribution Details.

C. The seizure and collection order against the Defendants and the Defendants’ collection order.

arrow