A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2012, the Defendant sentenced the Cheongju District Court to three years of imprisonment for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 5, 2015.

1. The Defendant who habitually stolens and habitually stolens money and valuables by entering an empty house through the entrance door, etc. opened in order to raise living expenses, etc.

On April 21, 2015, from around 09:00 to around 19:00 on the same day, the Defendant entered the victim D’s house in a considerable area of Cheongju City into the said house through an open gate, and found the key to the gate under the part of the chemical part where the gate was located, opened the gate as the key and entered the said house into the gate, and then, there was one 1 khmmmp equivalent to KRW 700,000,000 in the market value of the victim’s ownership, and 18kmpmp equivalent to KRW 20,000 in the market value.

In addition, from May 11, 2015 to May 15, 15, 2015, the Defendant stolen money and valuables equivalent to KRW 17.99,000 in total, or entered the victim's gatherings four times, such as the statement in the list of crimes, from that time, or attempted without theft of money and valuables on the wind.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen or attempted to steals the victims' property.

2. On May 3, 2015, the Defendant violated the Fraud and the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act: (a) purchased one cigarette of the victim F’s “G convenience store” in Cheongju-si, considerable amount of Cheongju-si; and (b) settled the purchase price, and (c) presented a stolen h’s new e-mail card (I) in the name of H as indicated in [Attachment List No. 28]; and (d) signed the sales slip as if the Defendant was the lawful holder of the above e-mail card; and (b) signed the sales slip and received a one cigarette of the amount of KRW 45,000 at the market price from the employees due to the lack of the name of the above convenience store.

This is the defendant.