The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the above judgment shall be publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person who was a spouse who completed marriage reporting with D on March 7, 2005.

On July 10, 2012, around 05:00, the Defendant provided “Fnaart club” on the first floor, Dong-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, with a single sexual intercourse with B.

B. On July 18, 2012, around 04:00, the Defendant sent sexual intercourse with B one time with a mother telecom, where the name of the Daejeon Seo-dong cannot be known.

C. On July 26, 2012, around 04:00, the Defendant sent sexual intercourses with B and once in the Hemotoel located in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon.

The Defendant’s rank around 05:00 on August 2012, 201.

At the location of subsection B, B and once sexual intercourse.

E. On August 7, 2012, around 04:00, the Defendant sent sexual intercourses with B and once in the Hemotoel located in Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon.

F. On August 28, 2012, the Defendant was above the Defendant around 17:00.

At the location of subsection B, B and once sexual intercourse.

G. On September 10, 2012, the Defendant was above the Defendant around 18:00.

At the location of subsection B, B and once sexual intercourse.

2. The judgment and the conclusion are as follows: (a) a prosecutor prosecuted the above facts charged against the defendant by applying Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act; and (b) a judgment subject to a retrial was finalized on June 26, 2014, but Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act became final and conclusive on February 26, 2015; (c) a decision of unconstitutionality made by the Constitutional Court on February 26, 2015 (the Constitutional Court Decision 2009Hun-Ba17,205, 2014, 2010Hun-Ba194, 2011, 2011Hun-Ba4, 2012Hun-Ba57, 255, 2013Hun-Ba139, 161, 267, 276, 342, 364 (Joint), 2011Hun-Ba31, 2014).

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Do8317, Jun. 28, 2007). Accordingly, the instant facts charged constitute a crime.