The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal (one year of suspended sentence in four months of imprisonment) is deemed to be too untile and unfair.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the lower court’s judgment and the sentencing of the lower court is not beyond the reasonable scope of discretion, it is desirable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). There is no change in circumstances in matters on which the conditions of sentencing are attached after the sentence of the lower judgment.

피고인은 원 청인 주식회사 계룡 팰리스로부터 공사대금을 지급 받지 못하여 이 사건에 이르게 된 것으로 보여 범행 경위에 다소 참작할 사정이 있는 점, 피해자 E, F, C에게 합계 1,200만 원의 체당금이 지급된 점 등을 고려 하면, 검사가 항소 이유로 주장하는 사정을 감안하더라도 원심의 양형이 너무 가벼워 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어났다고

subsection (b) of this section.

We do not accept the prosecutor's improper argument of sentencing.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and all is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.