1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) KRW 700,000 and as regards this, July 10, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant Kukkiwon is a juristic person established pursuant to the Act on the Promotion of Taekwondo and Creation of the Taekwondo Park for the purpose of Taekwondo test and various educational activities for the dissemination of Taekwondo, etc., and specific affairs concerning the implementation of the Taekwondo Examination shall be delegated to City/Do Taekwondo Association across the country, including the defendant Taekwondo Association in Seoul (hereinafter “the defendant Association”), and City/Do Taekwondo Association re-entrusts the above procedure to the Taekwondo Association in each Gu.

B. On September 5, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) entered Korea as the top of Taekwondo 1 team, and (b) entered Korea on August 29, 2014, as Seoul National University C Department 2014.

C. On September 2014, the Plaintiff visited e-sports centers in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D stores (hereinafter “instant sports center”) operated by Defendant B, and heard from Defendant B that “I would have the instant sports center issued two short-term short-term copies of training from the instant sports center,” and registered with the said sports center by paying KRW 700,000 to Defendant B for the purpose of obtaining two short-term copies of training fees.

On October 2014, Defendant B submitted an application for examination of the F Taekwondo Association for the issuance of the Plaintiff’s second associates to the Plaintiff, and the F Taekwondo Association submitted the application to the Defendant Kukkiwon by designating G, a president of the Association, as a recommending person.

E. On October 18, 2014, the Plaintiff was subject to the examination of winning, and passed three items, such as winter, brug, brus, and basic practice.

F. However, Defendant Taekwondo Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) notified Defendant B of the purport that the Plaintiff’s period of stay in Korea is not more than six months, and thus the Plaintiff’s certificate cannot be issued.

G. Accordingly, on November 4, 2014, Defendant B presented a written petition to the Plaintiff on the ground that he/she would request the Plaintiff to issue a short certificate, but Defendant B’s Kukkiwon on December 12, 2014, Article 6(4) of the instant operational rules.