logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.07.06 2017고정1257
주거침입등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A (the remaining, the age of 57) of 2017, “A” (the age of 57) had a relationship with the victim B (the age of 54) and the victim who was in an internal relationship with the victim B (the age of 54), and on May 2017, the Defendant demanded that “The length of each other is different,” “The Hague” continue to maintain the relationship.

A. On November 1, 2017, around 09:00, through a joint entrance door that was not corrected by Ulsan-gu Seoul apartment on around 09:00, and around 10 minutes of the entrance door around the victim’s residence, approximately 3 to 4 parts of the entrance door around D, the victim’s residence, was opened, and 4 to 5 parts of the front door were divided into 10 times by 3 to 4 parts, and 10 parts of the front door.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building without permission against the will of the victim and the joint housing right holder, thereby harming the peace of residence.

B. Before the intimidation, the victim did not open the door in the Defendant’s disturbance at the location of “A” before the victim’s disturbance, and expressed his/her intention to threaten the victim by attaching a mersh stating “Isday, Isday, Isday, Isday, Isday, Isday, Isday, Isday, Isday to find Isday from the date’s dwelling entrance and the vehicle of the victim’s (E) located in the underground parking lot.”

around October 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened the entrance door of the above residence and entered the entrance of the entrance of the victim, on the ground that the victim was not in an internal relationship with the victim B (n, 54 years old); (b) around 20:30 on October 16, 2017, the victim was not in a domestic relationship with the victim B (n, e.g., the victim’s dwelling).

Accordingly, the defendant infringed on the victim's residence against the victim's will.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 High Court Decision 1257]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. On-site photographs and the entrance photographs attached to the entrance, and the contents of the shape attached to the victim's vehicle;

1. A report on investigation (on-site search) (2017 Go fixed 1,301);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. On-site photographs;

arrow