logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.21 2017나76210
보증금반환
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against Defendant D and E is revoked, and the part of the plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. On October 20, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) is the Plaintiff’s leakage of the claim; (b) Defendant B and C are the husband and wife; (c) Defendant B owned an apartment complex of 49 square meters donated by her mother; and (d) would sell 30 square meters of apartment units with money sold. If the Plaintiff wishes, the Plaintiff would have leased 1 bonds out of 49 square meters; (d) the said Defendant did not have any apartment units at the time of sale (the end of 49 square meters), and (e) the Plaintiff did not have the capacity to purchase the said apartment units (the end of 200 square meters), and (e) the Plaintiff would have concluded a lease agreement of 106 and 2504,000,000,000 won (the remainder of the rental housing units (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”); and (e) on December 13, 2015, the Plaintiff would have concluded a lease agreement of 106 and 305,000,00 won (the remaining rental housing units).

arrow