1. The Defendant shall deliver to the Plaintiff the real estate indicated in the attached list, and deliver the said real estate from December 1, 2013.

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the plaintiff leased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as "the real estate of this case") owned by the plaintiff to the defendant on June 1, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "the real estate of this case") from June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2014, and at that time, it can be recognized that the above real estate was delivered to the defendant. It is apparent that the above lease contract of this case as of the date of the closing of argument of this case was terminated due to the expiration of the period.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and ② pay the rent or the unjust enrichment of the rent party calculated by the ratio of KRW 35 million from December 1, 2013 to the completion date of delivery of the said real estate from December 1, 2013 to the date of delivery of the said real estate.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.