beta
Text
1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 18,926,00 and KRW 1,505,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 18,926,00 from January 23, 2013, and KRW 17,421,00.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. (1) On May 15, 2012, C acquired a vehicle and completed the ownership transfer registration in its name on June 12, 2012, by selling EMW 760Li (12 air transit 6,00c, 200c, 204 formula; hereinafter “instant vehicle”) in the procedure for compulsory auction (D) by a motor vehicle conducted in Seongbuk-Nam support, for KRW 25,030,000,000.
(2) The instant automobile, which was imported into the Republic of Korea in Japan, was appraised in KRW 75,00,000 even though it had not been operated smoothly due to the discharge of a ship, etc. during the compulsory auction procedure, and was sold to C through two times of a bid.
B. (1) On May 2012, C requested the Defendant to repair the instant motor vehicle through the East F, as the instant motor vehicle did not appear at the time of auction, and it was at the time of the auction, and there was a problem, such as that C was not able to walk well at the time of the auction, and there was a trouble, such as the right engine (six parts) not operated when seen in the driver’s seat.
(2) The Defendant repaired the engine of the instant vehicle, replaced with Engine and ECU (electronic control device that controls the conditions of automobile engines, automatic transmission devices, etc. using computers) (hereinafter “the instant primary repair”). On July 7, 2012, the Plaintiff, at the time of the Plaintiff, was on board and carrying the instant vehicle and was on board at KRW 4,335,00,00 at the time of the Plaintiff, who was on board the instant vehicle and was charged with KRW 1,650,00,000 at the ECU exchange and time approval work cost, and KRW 500,000,000 at the order manufacturing cost.
(See Evidence A 5). (c)
The occurrence of a motor vehicle fire and C’s death (1) C re-exploited the problem that the trial operation of the motor vehicle in this case is not well known, and on January 7, 2013, again requested the Defendant to repair the motor vehicle.
In September 2012, the Plaintiff entered Korea as a month for re-repair.